Technical Bulletin
May, 2007
3
Structural Performance Tests of VHB
™
Structural Glazing Tapes
Introduction
3M™ VHB™ Acrylic Foam Bonding Tapes have been used worldwide in a variety of
applications in the construction industry. To further support consideration for structural
glazing applications, performance tests were conduced at an independent accredited 3rd party
test facility (Winwall Technology Pte Ltd - Singapore) to evaluate 3M™ VHB™ Structural
Glazing Tape under stresses and environmental conditions that glass panels would typically
experience in a glazed curtain wall system.
Summary
The glazed panels constructed with 3M™ VHB™ Structural Glazing Tapes provided
excellent performance overall compared to a control panel glazed with a one part structural
silicone. The first test sequence consisted of a PVB laminated glass panel bonded with 3M™
VHB™ Structural Glazing Tape 4972, a double glazed unit (DGU) bonded with 3M™
VHB™ Structural Glazing Tape G23F and a DGU bonded with a one part structural silicone.
No failure was observed with either the 3M™ VHB™ Tape or the structural silicone glazed
panels in any of the tests including ASTM E330 wind load structural tests at ambient, cold
and hot temperatures (-25°C and 70°C) up to 2.9 kPa (60 psf), corresponding to a wind speed
of 250 kph (155 mph). After this, pressures were gradually increased up to 8.4 kPa (175 psf)
at ambient temperature conditions. At this point the laminated glass failed and blew out of the
chamber. However, glass was still attached and bonded to the 3M™ VHB™ Structural
Glazing Tape 4972 around the perimeter of the frame demonstrating the high strength of the
tape. An 8.4 kPa pressure load is equivalent to a wind speed of 426 kph (264 mph).
A second test sequence patterned after the first test sequence was run consisting of two
single pane tempered glass panels. One was bonded with 3M™ VHB™ Structural Glazing
Tape G23F and the other with one part structural silicone. The DGU panels bonded with
3M™ VHB™ Structural Glazing Tape G23F were also subjected to this second test
sequence after surviving the first test sequence. No failure was observed with either the
3M™ VHB™ Tape glazed panels or the structural silicone glazed panel in any of the tests
including ASTM E330 wind load structural tests up to 10 kPa (210 psf), which corresponds
to a sustained wind speed of 290 mph (467 kph).
(1)
Conclusions
In the tests conducted, 3M™ VHB™ Structural Glazing Tapes G23F and 4972 fulfilled all the
requirements as specified by ASTM E283, ASTM E331 and ASTM E330 test methods.
Their performance exceeded expectations as shown in tests with more stringent conditions
such as structural loads at -25°C (-13°F) and at 70°C (158°F) with test method ASTM E330.
The conditions set for air infiltration and water leakage were higher than the minimum
standards outlined in ASTM E283 and ASTM E331. Furthermore, the destructive structural
load performance for the laminated glass frame was exceeded by > 250% (failure due to
glass breakage, and > 300% for structures with tempered glass and DGU glass.
Overall, in the tests conducted, there were no observable differences between 3M™ VHB™
Structural Glazing Tapes and structural silicone in terms of performance; all fulfilled and
exceeded their basic objectives.